Every year, regional legal publications from around the state, honor their respective local attorneys by publishing their Legal Elite features. These features highlight the top attorneys in the region as voted on by other attorneys in that region. Every active attorney is eligible to participate and be recognized by his or her peers.
From our Greenville office, Managing Attorney and Education
Law Unit Head, Kimaka Nichols-Graham
was named as one of Legal Elite of the Upstate in Education Law.
From our Columbia office, Probate Law Unit Head and Lead Education Discipline Law Attorney, Jennifer Rainville was named as one of Legal Elite of the Midlands in Education Law.
Fighting over custody or getting
divorced can be one of the hardest times in a person’s life. There are all sorts of unknowns and stressors
that can cause any person involved in a family court case to worry and be unable
to sleep. Many people involved in a
custody or divorce case find themselves angry and needing to vent or talk to
someone about what they are going through.
They need to be able to say how horrible their spouse is or what needs
to happen in their case. With the rise
in popularity of social media, many people with an ongoing case in family law
will post their thoughts or feelings online.
As an attorney, I have seen many
cases turn on the fact that one party posted something on Facebook, Snapchat, or another social media site. Posting something negative about your child’s
other parent is never a good idea, even if it is true. Family Court judges want to see that parents
can work together, respect each other, and co-parent. Encouraging your child to have a healthy
relationship with his or her other parent will look favorable on you in court. Telling the world how awful your ex is, will
only make you look bad.
Some people use social media to
brag about their lifestyle, wealth, how hard they partied last week, their
favorite illegal drug, or who they are in a relationship with. I have used these types of posts to show the
court that the other party is making more money than what they declared. This
can lead to a higher child support or alimony obligation if I can prove that
the other party is not being truthful about their income. I have also used posted
photos showing a party waving a gun around or smoking pot which can result in the
court suspending visitation with that parent.
Many temporary and final orders will
have language that may prevent one parent from talking bad about the other
parent in front of the child or discussing the case with the child. Parents should read their court orders and
follow it word for word. Posting online
that you told your child something or posting something knowing that your child
could read it, could result in the court holding you in contempt.
Many people are shocked to learn
that a parent could be forced to turn over everything that they have ever
posted or texted during the discovery phase of the case. Many of my clients view what they post as
private. However, in custody and divorce
proceedings there is little to no privacy.
Be prepared for everything that you ever posted on Facebook or any other
site to be viewed by your ex and his or her attorney, and maybe even by a
Although social media can be fun
and an easy way to vent and get things off your chest, I strongly caution my
clients to be very careful about what they are posting online. Posting online that you are “going to Aruba
for vacation” but then claiming you cannot afford child support can land you in
hot water with the court. You can choose
to stay out of trouble by not posting.
mind has a unique ability of savoring delightful memories. Summer in the South makes me think about
fresh cut grass, the sound and smell of a light rain that you can see marching
across fields of your neighbor’s yard. We would play outside most of the day. Those
are some of my memories associated with summer.
What will this generation of students remember about this summer?
school year, there was a new energy and increasing camaraderie about public
education in South Carolina. Everyone
expressed a desire to improve education outcomes and find a way to support
teaching as a profession. What can South
Carolina Legal Services do to improve educational outcomes? We are a statewide law firm and we meet
thousands of vulnerable or fragile families each year. We are not educators. We are not legislators.
human, and many of the clients we serve are a part of various kinds of families
can take a moment and think about what an eviction will mean for a school aged
child and explain the McKinney Vento Homeless Act.
can take a breath and ask what switching a “week on and week off” custody arrangement
will do to a child.
a parent can no longer pay child support because she lost her job, we can ask
her how else she can be involved in their lives. Maybe she can call more often,
or text if that is how they communicate.
we are preparing documents for temporary hearings, we can ask which parent
reads to or with the child at night. Encourage your client to be the parent who
reads with her child.
can ask clients to think about their child’s future.
working with parents on an affidavit for a temporary hearing, ask them to
dedicate a paragraph to their child, and start off with that paragraph. Encourage
them to reflect more on why they should have custody.
can ask families that are struggling with budgeting what they would like to
teach their child about managing finances.
can ask people that are struggling with keeping steady employment if they have
thought about creating a small business or a separate source of income based on
a hobby they enjoy or a skill they possess.
can ask our clients if they have noticed whether their child is aware of the
stress they are experiencing, and whether have they thought about how stress
can impact their child.
We cannot educate. We
cannot legislate. We cannot preach. We can ask. After all, we are masters at
carefully adding information into the record with leading questions. Never
underestimate a lawyer that cares.
The South Carolina Regulation of
Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers Act (“Dealers Act”)
S.C. Code Ann. §§ 56-15-10 to -600
(2006 & Supp. 2014).
The Dealers Act is
available to South Carolina consumers who have been harmed by unfair methods of
competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices as defined in the Act.  It applies to any person who engages directly
or indirectly in purposeful contacts within the state of South Carolina in
connection with the offering or advertising for sale of a motor vehicle or who has
business dealings with respect to a motor vehicle within this State.
Specific violations stated within the Dealers
a purchaser of a new motor vehicle to also purchase special features,
appliances, equipment, parts or accessories not desired or requested—unless
they were already on the car when it came to the dealership;
represent and sell as a new motor vehicle one which is used, including one that
has been used and operated for demonstration purposes; and
to or using any false or misleading advertisement in connection with the
Sometimes advertising is not false or
misleading, it’s just “puffing”.
According to Black’s Law Dictionary “puffing” is the expression of an
exaggerated opinion — as opposed to a factual misrepresentation — with the
intent to sell a good or service. Puffing involves expressing opinions, not
asserting something as a fact. Although there is some leeway in puffing goods,
a seller may not misrepresent them or say they have attributes that they do not
What are some of the acts and practices
that have been found to be arbitrary, in bad faith, or unconscionable? First, S.C. Courts have defined those terms
conduct is readily definable and includes acts which are unreasonable,
capricious or nonrational; not done according to reason or judgment; depending
on will alone.
is “[t]he opposite of good faith, generally implying or involving actual
or constructive fraud, or a design to deceive or mislead another, or a neglect
or refusal to fulfill some duty or some contractual obligation, not prompted by
an honest mistake as to one’s rights or duties, but by some interested or
sinister motive.” 
“Unconscionability has been
recognized as the absence of meaningful choice on the part of one party due to
one-sided contract provisions, together with terms which are so oppressive that
no reasonable person would make them and no fair and honest person would accept them.”
Here are some methods
employed by dealers that violate the Dealers Act:
Collecting insurance premiums but then failing to apply
them and failing to tell the purchaser they have no insurance;
in a financing application made by a dealer such as:
listing the purchaser’s identity;
wrong motor vehicle as the collateral;
the purchaser’s monthly income to qualify them for a loan;
to act in good faith when a purchaser requests that the dealer correct inaccuracies
in paperwork and/or assist in correcting problems caused by dealer’s bad faith
that your payment will be lower in the future;
extended service contracts but calling them warranties;
false statements about the condition of the motor vehicle;
closing fees that are not actual expenses incurred by the dealer.
Act provides remedies for acts which cause damage to any of the parties or to
the public. These include a private
action for money damages and injunctive relief.
In an action for money damages, the amount recovered is doubled and you
can seek attorney fees and costs. If the
dealer acted maliciously, punitive damages not exceeding triple the damages can
Under the Act,
dealers are required to maintain complete and correct records of each sale
transaction for at least four years and the Statute of limitations for pursuing
a private action is four years. 
S.C. Attorney General has the power to investigate, issue cease and desist
orders and injunctive relief on any valid abuse connected with the sale, rental
or leasing of a new or used motor vehicle.
But the Act requires that reasonable attempts by the consumer have first
been made with the dealer to alleviate the complaint.
NOTE: All the names in this
article have been changed to protect their identities.
Domenika Johnson came home from
work one evening to find a For Sale sign in her front yard. Surely, this was a
mistake. Maybe the realtor meant to put it on the property next to hers. It was
vacant, and Domenika had not seen anyone coming or going there in years – for
as long as she lived there, actually. In the mailbox, she had a letter from a
real estate company. The first line made her heart sink. The property you are
occupying belongs to someone else, it read. This could not be. Her property?
Her home? She bought it with her own savings 15 years ago. She only had 5 years
left on the mortgage. In that moment, Domenika felt panic come over her. What
was going on? What could she do? Where could she turn? As she spent the next
few days trying to sort out what was happening, her home was auctioned off and
She came to South Carolina Legal
Services (SCLS) with little hope. It was too late, she thought. The closing was
taking place a couple days later. Her home was gone. But she was determined to keep
fighting, she just needed help. The first step for us was to ensure that the
auction sale would not be finalized. We filed for a temporary restraining
order, asking that the court delay the closing until a hearing could be held to
determine what happened and to whom the property really belonged. Our motion
was granted. Our attorneys and paralegals started working on piecing together
The “rest” soon became clearer.
Domenika’s lot came from a couple who were developing their land back in the
70s. At that time, a home was to be built on Lot 13. The lot next to it, Lot 12,
was to be vacant. Due to circumstances that we may never know, the home was
actually built on Lot 12. This was never reflected in any records. All the
records showed Lot 13 as having a house on it and Lot 12 as vacant and
unimproved. In reality, Lot 13 was vacant and unimproved, and Lot 12 had a
house on it. For over 20 years, despite numerous ownership changes, property
valuations and surveying, the mistake was never noted or corrected. For over 15
years, Domenica had been living in and paying mortgage and taxes on a house,
which according to the official records did not exist. Home Money LLC bought Lot
12 at a tax sale for less than $1,000. It was advertised as “unimproved”. Since
there was a house on that lot, they were now trying to flip it for $40,000.
Domenika was in danger of losing
everything, only because of a recording error four decades prior, and a predatory
business that was trying to make a quick buck. Home Money LLC was trying to use
every legal loophole to speed up the sale and finalize the deal. SCLS, too was
trying to exhaust every legal remedy to keep Domenika in her home. Court
action, legal motions, community partner involvement, settlement offers – we
Although we were prepared for a
long trial and felt confident that law and fairness were on our side, we wanted
to resolve it as quickly as possible to allow Domenika a peace of mind. In the
nick of time, we were able to find a buyer for the unimproved, vacant lot. With
that money, we were able to settle the case with Home Money LLC. Domenika got
to keep her home. The records were changed to reflect the reality. She now
legally owns Lot 12 with a house on it.
Her angels, as she calls us, have
helped keep Domenika in her home. We are also grateful for a grant from Bank of
America, which allowed us to accept this case. Domenika was slightly above our
regular income guidelines, but she was far from being able to afford an
attorney. We could not have accepted her case if not for this specific grant
from Bank of America which allows us to take accept some clients in certain
circumstances who are over income.
In 2016, North Charleston
experienced the highest rate of eviction (16.5 out of 100 renters) of any area
in the United States. The national average was 6.53 per 100. In that same timeframe, 10.03 households per
day were evicted. Low income tenants spent
upwards of 70% of their monthly income on housing costs. Eviction is closely linked to homelessness. Up to 70% of tenants facing eviction have no access
to legal knowledge or representation. The
numbers are shocking.
These factors prompted the South Carolina
Access to Justice Commission to petition the S.C. Supreme Court to form the
first ever housing court in South Carolina.
South Carolina Legal Services (SCLS) and other local providers of legal
and social services came together to seek the Commission’s support in
submitting the petition to the Supreme Court in order to set up a viable
experiment. On May 24, 2019, that
proposal took one step closer to becoming a reality when the Chief Justice of
the Supreme Court issued an order approving the Commission’s proposal[MF1] and
creating what is officially called the Charleston Housing Court Pilot Project
Under the Pilot Project, three
Charleston County magistrates have been appointed to serve as judges of the
housing court. Besides SCLS, other partners
in the project include One80 Place Legal Services, Charleston Legal Access,
Charleston Pro Bono Legal Services, Charleston County Magistrate Courts, the
Charleston School of Law, Trident Urban League, 2-1-1 Hotline, the City of
Charleston and Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.
The magistrate courts and the
project partners will draw up criteria to determine who is eligible to
participate in the Pilot Project. Under
the Commission’s proposal, the process for connecting potential eligible
tenants with attorneys is two-fold. For
tenants who contact the magistrate courts to request an eviction hearing, one
will be scheduled for a designated housing court day. The tenant will then call 2-1-1, which can
screen the tenant for income eligibility and connect the tenant with a local
legal services provider such as SCLS to meet with the tenant and determine
whether representation will be provided.
For tenants who do not call 2-1-1
ahead of their scheduled hearing, One80 Place will coordinate with the
Charleston School of Law and other pro bono attorneys to place someone at the
relevant magistrate courts on the days designated for housing court. For tenants that desire representation, they
will meet with the legal counsel and, depending on the facts of the tenant’s
case, the attorney will try the case or attempt to mediate it or otherwise
resolve the matter with the landlord outside of trial.
The Chief Justice’s order
delineates several data points that must be kept in order to track the Pilot Project’s
effectiveness. These include the
of tenants represented and by whom
of evictions filed
of hearings requested
of evictions that were settled or dismissed
tenants provided financial support
number of evictions averted by mediation,
hearing, or financial support
number of evictions with writs of ejectment
a comparison of number of evictions filed and
the number of writs of ejectment in the three pilot project Magistrate Courts
with the number of evictions of the other Magistrate Courts in Charleston
There is no official start date for the Pilot Project, which may take
time to set up. However, the May 29th
order was a necessary and powerful signal that evictions in Charleston County will
start getting the attention they deserve while tenants get the legal services
I watched the episode below of the
television series, Stalked, several years ago and it forever changed my
understanding of stalking.
This episode is based on real life
events. The print from the mirror being licked, in particular, helped me better
understand the fear and the invasion of privacy that stalking victims
experience. The constant fear of being watched and repeated acts of unwanted
conduct is psychological torment. Whereas an incident of physical abuse is
limited in time to the actual act itself, even if it recurs, stalking, and the anxiety
it produces, takes place on a 24 hour, never ending continuum. For example, the
opposing party in one of my recent divorce cases was physically abusive towards
my client, but his repeated phone calls to her after the separation disturbed
her even more than the hitting and shoving. He would repeatedly call and text client,
as often as ninety times within a 90-minute period. His contact would occur all
throughout the day, as early as 9 a.m. and as late as 2 a.m. He would show up
in places where he knew she would visit, like the gym. To make matters worse,
it can be difficult to get legal relief as a stalking victim because the
harassment is harder to prove than physical abuse. There is usually less evidence
and stalkers often use technology to conceal their identity.
I recently participated in a webinar,
SPARC: Identifying and Responding to Stalking, presented by the Stalking
Prevention Awareness and Resource Center. Here are three tips from the webinar
that I find helpful when serving our South Carolina Legal Services (SCLS)
clients who are victims of stalking:
A web-based service that lets you know who is
behind an anonymous blocked Caller ID: www.trapcall.com. When a call is declined, the phone rings back
and unmasks the calling number, providing you with information about who is
calling and where they live, even before the call is answered. It stops spam
callers and automatically blocks spam, telemarketing and robocalls. Stalkers
often call victims from apps that assign them different phone numbers. It also
allows the person who was called to record incoming calls, which can be used to
provide police and attorneys with proof of harassment. Note that this is a paid
Stalkers often use apps to change the number
shown on the Caller ID to make it appear that it is a friend or family member
of the victim that is calling. This is known as spoofing. One way to prove spoofing
is to obtain the phone records from the victim, the supposed calling friend or relative,
and the suspect. The victim’s record will show the “friend” called, the
friend’s records will show that no call was placed. The suspect’s records will
show a call to a spoof service. Financial records or a review of the suspect’s app
store on a cell phone can reveal the purchase of apps used to stalk victims.
Victims should usually be advised to have no
contact at all with the offender. If a stalker calls the victim 59 times, and
the victim answers the 59th call, it reinforces to the stalker that they
only have to call 59 times the next time and they will be rewarded by the
victim’s answering. However, stopping all contact may not be the best advice in
all situations. Victims are in the best position to know how to keep themselves
safe. It may be safer for them to have limited contact to minimize the threat. Telling
a client to change their phone number may escalate the threat of physical harm
if the stalker then acts out due to a loss of control or contact. Telling a
victim to move or change their number may put them at more risk if they can
still be found at their place of employment or a relative or friend’s home.
Because of the challenges facing the staking victims, it important for those of us who represent and assist them to stay informed on the dynamics of stalking and ever-evolving tactics that stalkers use. If you are a victim of stalking, South Carolina Legal Services may be able to help. To apply, please call our statewide Intake Office at 1-888-346-5592. You can call between 9:00 am and 6:00 pm, Monday through Thursday. We also have an Apply Online option for a limited number of legal issues: http://www.lawhelp.org/sc/online-intake.
NOTE: All the names in this article have
been changed to protect their identity.
Blake thought she needed to file bankruptcy when she was sued by Sunshine
Finance. South Carolina Legal Services
(SCLS) clients are often fearful that bankruptcy is the only answer, because debt
buyers and finance companies often tell them that. However, when you are on a
fixed income and have no assets to protect (such as a house or a car), the
creditor has no remedy against you other than to get a judgment that they cannot
collect. We call this the bankruptcy
bypass or being judgment proof, because South Carolina law prohibits
garnishment of wages for consumer debt. Additionally, if a consumer has a house
or a car to protect, the property exemptions found in S.C. Code 15-41-30
usually protect them without the necessity of filing bankruptcy. You can find our brochure about being
judgment proof here.
for Ms. Blake, SCLS accepted her case and filed an Answer denying the alleged
debt. That kind of Answer is called a
general denial. In response to the
general denial, Sunshine Finance voluntarily dismissed its case against Ms.
Blake. It turns out that there was no
need for the client to file for bankruptcy. SCLS often has clients who are sued
for collection by a debt buyer like Sunshine Finance. A debt buyer is an entity that is in the
business of buying a debt for “pennies on the dollar” and then trying to
collect the entire amount from the consumer.
They most often have no way of proving the underlying debt, so, if they
sue a consumer, they rely on the consumer not responding. In that case, the debt buyer gets a default
judgment and the requirement of proof is very limited or, in some cases,
SCLS represents the consumer, the debt buyer or other creditor is forced to
present evidence with a live witness. This usually results in a dismissal, as
in the case of this client, or in a settlement. As of the date of this article,
SCLS had over 100 pending cases to defend consumers from debt collection and
unconscionable collection practices. The S.C. Consumer Protection Code and the
federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act are 2 of the tools we use most often
to protect clients from these practices.
Over 40 million Americans have an average student loan debt
of $30,000.00. Because they are unemployed or have income below the poverty
line, 28% of borrowers are unable to make payments on their student loans. It is
important to be aware of all the effects, advantages and disadvantages of
taking out a student loan.
If you are only thinking about attending college, think
carefully about whether your degree is likely to land you a job with a high
enough salary to be able to repay your student loans. If you are already in
college, having a part-time job may allow you to set some money aside to help
pay for the loans after you graduate or pay some of the interest on the loans
while in school. Consider other options to save money while in school: cook at
home instead of eating out, look for more affordable housing, buy or rent used
textbooks. Finally, stay in touch with your financial aid office to see if you
qualify for any grants and financial aid.
If you are already out of college and have student loans,
here is some important information to keep in mind. Your lenders are ready to
collect on the loans as soon as you are out of school, and they will. The Federal
government can garnish up to 15% of your weekly pay or 30 times the hourly minimum
wage – whatever is less. The government can also capture your tax refund or
send your loan to a collection agency.
If you need to delay repayment or temporarily stop making
payments on your federal student loans, check here
to see if you are eligible for a deferment or forbearance. If you have other
loans, contact the lender about income-based repayment programs to help you set
up a more appropriate payment plan. They are required to set you up for
whichever repayment plan you qualify.
If you are struggling with making regular payments on your
student loans, here are some resources to help educate you on your options.
Equal Justice Works offers
a free informational webinar that explains how you can reduce your monthly
student loan payments and qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness. You can
register for the webinar here.
They also offer a free e-book entitled “How to Manage Your Student Loan Debt
While Pursuing a Public Interest Career” which can be downloaded here.
Visit the Federal Student Aid website
for information on how to repay your loans, loan consolidation, forgiveness and
discharge, and more.
Check out our free
resources on student loans, financial education, financial aid scams
Remember, with very few exceptions, both federal
and private student loans must be repaid. In many cases, you cannot fully
discharge them in bankruptcy. It is important that you make timely payments,
and if you are unable to do so, that you seek help. South Carolina Legal
Services may be able to help. To apply, please call our statewide Intake Office
at 1-888-346-5592. You can call between 9:00 am and 6:00 pm, Monday through
Thursday. We also have an Apply Online option for a limited number of legal
The Rock Hill office welcomed a new staff attorney. Carla Bryson joined the office in April. She will be practicing primarily in the areas of consumer, housing, education, and family law.
Nothing about Carla’s journey has been traditional. After leaving the teaching profession, she attended community college where she earned an Associate’s Degree in Paralegal Studies. Carla worked for a law firm in North Carolina for about six months when she realized she wanted more. Because her children were now older, her husband convinced her it was time to chase her dream. And that’s what she did.
graduated from the University of South Carolina School of Law in December 2018. Carla’s love for reading and learning new things
made law school a little more tolerable and a little less grueling.
7, 2019, Carla was admitted to the South Carolina Bar. Carla hopes to be an
inspiration to others who may have abandoned their dreams.
enjoys reading and spending time with family. Carla has already started working
on her next dream. She dreams of traveling to Bora Bora with her family and
reading a good book while there.